Account
Compare Japanese car export quotes by putting both offers on the same vehicle, service, currency and timing basis. The lower headline price is not necessarily the lower comparable price. One quotation may already include work that another lists separately, while an unanswered charge should remain unknown rather than become zero.
Use the method below to identify the cheaper equivalent offer, then assess the differences that money alone cannot resolve. The worked figures are invented to demonstrate the calculation, not current prices or exchange rates.
Fix the comparison boundary first
Write a sentence defining what both totals must cover: the identified vehicle, agreed Japan-side work, ocean freight and specified insurance to one named destination port. Keep destination taxes, registration and other excluded costs in a separate section unless both offers explicitly include the same services.
For the same advertised car, match the full vehicle identifier and availability. For different cars, record specification, mileage, documented condition and included work separately. A cheaper vehicle with a different configuration is an alternative purchase, not a like-for-like price saving.
Use a reference from the Washin Auto inventory when requesting clarification. Do not use a model name alone to identify the subject of a quote.
Read the terms before adding charges
Ask each supplier to name the trade rule, its version and the relevant port or place. Record exactly which work is included in its price. Do not add “export fees” or inland transport a second time merely because your comparison sheet has separate rows for them.
Responsibility and price are separate questions. Under CIF, risk transfers when the goods are loaded aboard at the shipment port, although the seller arranges carriage and insurance to the destination port. The ICC Academy's explanation of CIF makes that distinction. A destination named beside a price does not by itself mean the seller bears every risk until arrival.
For each line use one of four entries: included, separately priced, excluded or unconfirmed. Ask what an unconfirmed item covers and who will invoice it. A total with an unresolved compulsory charge is not ready for a final ranking.
Build a comparison sheet
Keep the supplier's original figures intact beside your normalised calculation.
| Field | What to record for both offers |
|---|---|
| Vehicle | Identifier, specification and agreed condition |
| Quotation | Reference, issue date, expiry and revision |
| Route | Named departure/destination places and agreed transport scope |
| Included work | Each service and any bundled charges |
| Money | Invoice currency, payment stages and conversion basis |
| Insurance | Insured scope, exclusions and who handles a claim |
| Open items | Missing prices, assumptions and clarification owner |
The services overview can help frame questions, but only the quotation establishes what is priced for your transaction.
Worked example: a lower total that changes with currency
Assume two hypothetical offers for equivalent vehicles and the same agreed shipment and insurance scope. Both have complete Japan-side charges, including loading, within their vehicle packages. Both exclude destination costs and bank charges. No omitted fee is being treated as zero; the example deliberately stops at the same limited boundary.
For comparison only, assume JPY 150 = USD 1.
| Comparable component | Quote A | Quote B |
|---|---|---|
| Vehicle and complete Japan-side package | JPY 900,000 | Included in bundle |
| Ocean freight | USD 1,100 | Included in bundle |
| Agreed insurance | USD 100 | Included in bundle |
| Supplier's bundled price | Not applicable | USD 7,400 |
| Normalised subtotal | USD 7,200 | USD 7,400 |
The calculation is JPY 900,000 ÷ 150 + USD 1,100 + USD 100 = USD 7,200. Quote A is USD 200 lower within this boundary. Adding another Japan-handling allowance would double-count a service already included by assumption.
Now change only the illustrative exchange rate to JPY 145 = USD 1. Quote A becomes 900,000 ÷ 145 + 1,200 = USD 7,406.90, rounded to cents. Quote B remains USD 7,400 under the assumed fixed-dollar offer. The apparent advantage has disappeared.
This is sensitivity analysis, not a currency forecast. Replace the invented rate with the conversion actually available for your payment, including the relevant charges. Recheck whether the supplier's currency and price remain fixed until you pay. If payment dates differ, retain that difference rather than comparing two supposedly fixed totals.
Resolve the non-price differences
An offer can be numerically comparable while leaving a meaningful service difference. Ask whether promised rectification is completed before purchase, what evidence will be supplied, whether shipment timing is an estimate, and what happens if a stated assumption changes.
Do not turn an unknown inspection outcome into a guessed repair cost simply to make the spreadsheet complete. Keep it as an unresolved purchase question or obtain an appropriate assessment. Likewise, a more expensive quote may be preferable if it includes work you need, but explain that choice as a scope difference rather than calling it cheaper.
Before accepting, ask both suppliers to confirm the same list of inclusions and exclusions in writing. Save the revised quotations with the calculation so you can reconstruct the decision later.
Send Washin Auto your vehicle reference, destination port and required quotation scope. Ask for clarification of the unresolved lines before deciding which offer fits your purchase.